<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The F Rant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefrant.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefrant.com</link>
	<description>Con Frantzeskos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:36:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on People hate losing control (of videos) because they don&#8217;t expect to lose control by Roman</title>
		<link>http://www.thefrant.com/2011/03/29/people-hate-losing-control-of-videos/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrant.com/?p=2073#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Totally agree, if I ever come across them I usually just leave without waiting for my video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree, if I ever come across them I usually just leave without waiting for my video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cognitive Surplus visualised by Tweets that mention the F rant » Cognitive Surplus visualised -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thefrant.com/2010/07/27/cognitive-surplus-visualised/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention the F rant » Cognitive Surplus visualised -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrant.com/?p=2046#comment-277</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Nikki Bannatyne, Con Frantzeskos. Con Frantzeskos said: Cognitive Surplus visualised http://bit.ly/9MS1de [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Nikki Bannatyne, Con Frantzeskos. Con Frantzeskos said: Cognitive Surplus visualised <a href="http://bit.ly/9MS1de" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9MS1de</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sorry Kevin Rudd&#8217;s Sorry Record by Body fat scales</title>
		<link>http://www.thefrant.com/2010/05/18/sorry-kevin-rudds-sorry-record/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Body fat scales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 10:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrant.com/?p=2005#comment-273</guid>
		<description>Rudd hasn&#039;t explained what he expects the states to do with their mining royalties if the Resources Super Tax is implemented. Are they supposed to abandon royalties? If so, will the Commonwealth reimburse them the precise amount? If not, this will add an even greater burden on the mining industry. Do we really think W.A. will give up royalties for the good of the Commonwealth??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudd hasn&#8217;t explained what he expects the states to do with their mining royalties if the Resources Super Tax is implemented. Are they supposed to abandon royalties? If so, will the Commonwealth reimburse them the precise amount? If not, this will add an even greater burden on the mining industry. Do we really think W.A. will give up royalties for the good of the Commonwealth??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Visualising Churchill&#8217;s &#8216;We Shall Fight&#8230;&#8221; by public</title>
		<link>http://www.thefrant.com/2010/05/25/visualising-churchills-we-shall-fight/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>public</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrant.com/?p=2008#comment-276</guid>
		<description>gutless you don&#039;t put these comments on your website loser......too edgy for you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gutless you don&#8217;t put these comments on your website loser&#8230;&#8230;too edgy for you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Visualising Churchill&#8217;s &#8216;We Shall Fight&#8230;&#8221; by public</title>
		<link>http://www.thefrant.com/2010/05/25/visualising-churchills-we-shall-fight/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>public</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 11:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrant.com/?p=2008#comment-275</guid>
		<description>Great stuff for spin doctors mate contact the liberal party they need all the help for the ignorant masses...we don&#039;t all fit into that category mateyyyyyyy!

great stuff on hey hey by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff for spin doctors mate contact the liberal party they need all the help for the ignorant masses&#8230;we don&#8217;t all fit into that category mateyyyyyyy!</p>
<p>great stuff on hey hey by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rudd vs Zuckerberg &#8211; Who I&#8217;d rather have in charge by Tweets that mention the F rant » Rudd vs Zuckerberg – Who I’d rather have in charge -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thefrant.com/2010/05/25/rudd-vs-zuckerberg-who-id-rather-have-in-charge/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention the F rant » Rudd vs Zuckerberg – Who I’d rather have in charge -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 08:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrant.com/?p=2006#comment-274</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Con Frantzeskos, Matthew Dickinson. Matthew Dickinson said: RT @confrantzeskos: Rudd vs Zuckerberg – Who I’d rather have in charge http://bit.ly/bqhwhI [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Con Frantzeskos, Matthew Dickinson. Matthew Dickinson said: RT @confrantzeskos: Rudd vs Zuckerberg – Who I’d rather have in charge <a href="http://bit.ly/bqhwhI" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bqhwhI</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple iPad &#8211; What&#8217;s old is Newton by Tweets that mention the F rant » Apple iPad – What’s old is Newton -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thefrant.com/2010/05/18/apple-ipad-whats-old-is-newton/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention the F rant » Apple iPad – What’s old is Newton -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 17:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrant.com/?p=1998#comment-272</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Con Frantzeskos. Con Frantzeskos said: Apple iPad – What’s old is Newton http://bit.ly/dabAck [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Con Frantzeskos. Con Frantzeskos said: Apple iPad – What’s old is Newton <a href="http://bit.ly/dabAck" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dabAck</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple iPad &#8211; What&#8217;s old is Newton by The F Rant Apple Ipad What&#8217;s Old is Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.thefrant.com/2010/05/18/apple-ipad-whats-old-is-newton/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>The F Rant Apple Ipad What&#8217;s Old is Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 12:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrant.com/?p=1998#comment-271</guid>
		<description>[...] Now check out this 2010 for the new Apple iPad . I like the subtle hat tip back to the Newton ad. Let&#8217;s hpe the iPad is somewhat more successful than the Newton. I&#8217;d say it will be. Out with the stylus and handwriting recognition. &#8230;Continue Reading [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now check out this 2010 for the new Apple iPad . I like the subtle hat tip back to the Newton ad. Let&#8217;s hpe the iPad is somewhat more successful than the Newton. I&#8217;d say it will be. Out with the stylus and handwriting recognition. &#8230;Continue Reading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DJs scratching up the iPad by Paul Karagiannis</title>
		<link>http://www.thefrant.com/2010/03/29/djs-scratching-up-th-ipad/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Karagiannis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrant.com/?p=1961#comment-265</guid>
		<description>Kudos to Apple.

Kudos not for technical innovation but kudos for business direction. 

Kudos for developing machines whose main purpose is content access, not content production. Apple does not sell machines that run, they feel; Apple does not sell programs, they sell Apps; Apps are not cold and jagged, they&#039;re round and warm. 

Apple&#039;s journey into consumer content is perhaps the direction most envied. Pay per view or access is a well travelled path that could not have been undertaken before the PC and its related technologies burdened the average consumer with equipment better suited to engineers. Apple&#039;s iPad is not the crowning achievement of technology; iPad is the viewing window to a world created by technology. iPad owners need not construct sights, sounds or moods because the iPad will deliver all these.

The iPad, to paraphrase this forum, is simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to Apple.</p>
<p>Kudos not for technical innovation but kudos for business direction. </p>
<p>Kudos for developing machines whose main purpose is content access, not content production. Apple does not sell machines that run, they feel; Apple does not sell programs, they sell Apps; Apps are not cold and jagged, they&#8217;re round and warm. </p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s journey into consumer content is perhaps the direction most envied. Pay per view or access is a well travelled path that could not have been undertaken before the PC and its related technologies burdened the average consumer with equipment better suited to engineers. Apple&#8217;s iPad is not the crowning achievement of technology; iPad is the viewing window to a world created by technology. iPad owners need not construct sights, sounds or moods because the iPad will deliver all these.</p>
<p>The iPad, to paraphrase this forum, is simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Apple iPad &#8211; Initial Thoughts by Talking Football</title>
		<link>http://www.thefrant.com/2010/02/02/the-apple-ipad-initial-thoughts/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Talking Football</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrant.com/?p=1965#comment-268</guid>
		<description>You just imagine the ways we can get football now ... amazing Apple you have done it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just imagine the ways we can get football now &#8230; amazing Apple you have done it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

